What are some gender differences in leadership
Women in Germany
Prof. Heather Hofmeister and Lena Hünefeld
Prof. Heather Hofmeister, Ph.D., American doctorate in sociology at Cornell University (USA) 2002. From 2002 to 2007 research assistant at the University of Bamberg, since 2007 professor at RWTH Aachen University, since 2008 prorector for human resources and science Young generation, RWTH Aachen University.
Lena Hünefeld, M.A. Studied sociology, German philology and psychology at RWTH Aachen University until 2009. Since April 2009 research assistant at RWTH Aachen University. Since August 2009 doctorate in the research project "Gender in Leadership" at RWTH Aachen University.
Nevertheless, women are only represented in 25 percent of the cases at the first management level, which includes the board of directors, management and the main department, and 35 percent at the second management level, which includes all departments subordinate to the main department. If you look at the proportion of female managers in all working women, the difference between men and women in management positions becomes particularly clear: 10 percent of all employed men are managers and only 4 percent of all employed women. Thus, every tenth working man occupies a management position, while only every 25 working woman is active in the management level (IAB research report 2009). In the Dax30 companies there are a total of four women on the executive boards: Brigitte Ederer and Barbara Kux at Siemens, Dr. Angelika Dammann at SAP and Regine Stachelhaus at E.ON (DIW weekly report No. 3/2011)
In addition, the number of women in management positions varies depending on the industry. Women can be found in many management levels in health and social services and in the private service sector (almost 40 percent of women), while only a few, 8-18 percent, hold a management position in the banking and insurance sector (Balance Sheet Equal Opportunities 2006, PDF). A central question that arises in view of the numbers is why women are less represented in management positions.
Same qualifications - unequal opportunitiesOne reason that can largely be ruled out is that women are less qualified than their male counterparts. While the proportion of women among those who leave school with a general university entrance qualification is 56 percent higher than that of men, it is significantly lower at 38.6 percent among those who leave school without a qualification (Federal Statistical Office 2008 ). Furthermore, with 52.9 percent, women also overtook men in terms of university degrees (Federal Statistical Office 2008). According to statistics from Eurostat, men made up only 46.2 percent in 2008. This means that women no longer lag behind men in terms of training. In addition, there are a number of factors that influence the rise of women in management positions.
To explain the lack of women in management positions, one must first bear in mind that for a long time the labor market and the management levels were only dominated by men. This has resulted in the development of an idea of a successful career based on a man's experience of uninterrupted employment. Farther managers are associated with typical "male" characteristics such as dominance, self-confidence, autonomy, etc. As a result, leadership positions and leadership behavior are more likely to be associated with men than with women.
Most male employers often attribute a lack of self-confidence, poor self-presentation and a lack of assertiveness to women and consider them unsuitable for a management position - regardless of whether this is based on reality or not. In view of the research to date, however, it is doubtful that men have better qualities than women, either by nature or through gender-specific socialization, than women (Appelbaum / Audet / Miller 2003). Current research results tend to indicate that leadership qualities are not a question of gender, but rather of personality, and that men and women are equally suitable for a leadership position. Studies such as the GiL research project of the sociological institute of RWTH Aachen University have set themselves the task of further investigating the relationship between gender and leadership.
Another explanation for the shortage of women in leadership is that Division of labor in household and family, especially the time-consuming ascribed mother role. According to traditional role expectations and assignments, women in our society are still primarily responsible for caring for children, which almost excludes other tasks outside the household due to a lack of small childcare. There is also the image in German culture that men who have no time for their children in addition to their job fulfill their role as father by earning a good salary. Working women, on the other hand, are considered "bad mothers" if they are not busy with their children full-time. Thus, the traditional division of roles means that working men can pursue a career despite or perhaps because of the family, because their wives relieve them of the family. In contrast, working women often have to bear the double burden of family and work, as they rarely get the same support from their husbands. In addition, the compatibility of children, especially for women in management positions, is reinforced by the lack of part-time models for managers and / or less flexible and longer opening times of day-care centers.
The "glass ceiling"It is particularly noticeable that highly qualified women "get stuck" when moving up within a company or organization at the level of middle management and do not reach the management level even though they perform similarly to their preferred male colleagues. In addition, women find it difficult to take up a management position, especially in large companies, because there only five percent (balance sheet 2006, PDF) of management positions are held by women.
Ann Morrison and her colleagues summarized these phenomena in 1987 under the term "glass ceiling" (Morrison et al. 1987). You mean all invisible processes and factors that effectively prevent women from accessing management positions. These processes include the aspects already mentioned, but above all those Men's culture in companies. It often happens that men are promoted by their male superiors, while women are denied career opportunities. The preference for male employees thus also leads to male status security, security of the male core workforce and a manifestation of the current situation at management levels. In addition, women are a minority in management positions and are perceived as such. As a result, they are more often perceived as a member of a gender stereotype group than an individual with adequate qualifications. Similarly, women are largely excluded from important professional networks, while men use them for their advancement (joint leisure activities, pub visits after work or weekend invitations).
To make matters worse, the Ascent mostly in the executive floors of companies between the ages of 30 and 35 takes place. However, this is precisely the period in which women can only participate to a limited extent in working life due to childbirth and are therefore often ignored when filling good positions.
The fact that the size of the company has an influence on the advancement opportunities of women is due to the strong hierarchical and particularly male-dominated structure of large companies. The factors mentioned so far act in this sense especially in large companies. In addition, women are more likely to find management positions in small and medium-sized enterprises because women returning to work after their family phase are not automatically discriminated there because of their career interruptions and their older age. Systematic career planning in large companies seldom leaves enough room for career breaks. Furthermore, highly formalized recruitment procedures, as they are often used in large companies, often lead to a disadvantage for women. They are often based on a male full-time employment model and evaluate career breaks, e.g. as a loss of qualification. Smaller companies are also usually more family-friendly. Here women are often active as the owner, co-owner or wife of the owner in the highest management level. Because of the proximity of work and family, management activities are more often compatible with motherhood, which is usually a problem in large companies (Dienel 1996).
Income Groups *Distribution in percent, according to the highest professional qualification of 27 to 59 year old full-time employees, 2008
|< 900="">||900 to|
|≥ 2,600 euros|
|a total of|
|Technical / university degree **|
|Master / technician training|
|without a professional qualification|
* based on monthly net income
** including doctorate
Source: Federal Statistical Office
License: Creative Commons by-nc-nd / 3.0 / de
Federal Agency for Civic Education, 2010
- Why should I want to use IPv6
- Is anger a form of fear
- Frozen yogurt has active yogurt cultures
- Chinese really hate Japanese
- What causes pain in my face
- Where are data lakes used
- What are some examples of independent animals
- When would you use copyleft
- Who are the creators of Micromax
- Where can I get news about sports
- In which house does Shani act best
- How does a painter help us?
- What is a theatrical experience
- What is 8 9 28
- What causes urine yellow color
- Elon Musk has good business skills
- Which phones are not worth the price
- How to smoke a beef brisket
- How does Expensify work with Quickbooks
- Make turtles good pets in the office
- How do I find strongly expired domains
- Rumi and Shams were gay lovers
- Why did Sonu Nigam leave Twitter
- What is a mobile GPU